Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Ball v. McCollough et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
R. McCollough , Steward Bradford , Social Worker Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Alabama Department of Correction et al
as 7:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
Renaldo Demond Price
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Correction, Bibb Correctional Facility, W Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Velez et al
as 5:2015cv01877
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Dijion Parker
Defendant:
Sgt. Velez, Cpl. Bell, Officer Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams-Bey v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams-Bey
Defendant:
David B. Carpenter, II, Rick Yelding and Don Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01862
Plaintiff:
Everett Leon Stout
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Brian McVeigh, Leon Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
George Rutledge
Defendant:
William Bell, A.C. Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00747
Plaintiff:
Patrick Williams
Defendant:
William Bell, AC Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ruben Carpenter
Defendant:
William Bell, Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pylant v. Hightower et al
as 2:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pylant
Defendant:
Hightower, Sheryl Price, Hicks and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. Dorning et al
as 5:2013cv02331
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ltaubionjnire Holman
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison, Sgt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
