Cases 41 - 50 of 57
CAMPBELL v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2011cv03840
Plaintiff:
STANFORD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and WARDEN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD et al v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv05019
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HOWARD, CHIMAR RODGERS, NELSON LEON and others
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, CHRISTI RESSLER, KEVIN NEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL et al v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2010cv02623
Plaintiff:
DONALD CAMPBELL, CAESAR ROWE and JOSEPH FREELY
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. (CFCF) CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv01392
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE L. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
(CFCF) CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN LANEY, DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. LAMAS et al
as 3:2009cv01766
Plaintiff:
Bernadette V. White
Defendant:
Mary Lamas, Mary Lamas, Michael David Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN SCOTT v. CHERISH et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
KARL VAN SCOTT
Defendant:
JOSH CHERISH, SHELLY TAYLOR, ROXANN CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. CAMPBELL
as 2:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
CLINTON WALKER
Defendant:
G. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DANTZLER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DANTZLER
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, DORINA VARNER, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
