Cases 41 - 50 of 181
Newell v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
James C. Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B Epps, Ron King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and David Petrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine A. James
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Epps, et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
John B. Herring
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
McQua Jones and Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Carbin v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID C. FATHI, A.C.L.U.
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 3:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Wimdal , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team, Unknown Dykes, Unknown Wimdal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Epps
as 3:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Gilmore
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Woodall et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Tony Gilmore
Defendant:
Ron Woodall, Gloria Perry, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
