Cases 41 - 50 of 334
Davis v. Cox et al
as 4:2011cv13818
Plaintiff:
Ernest Davis
Defendant:
Mike Cox, Patricia Caruso, Norma Killough and others
Lilly #730472 v. McKeon et al
as 1:2011cv00888
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ray Lilly #730472
Defendant:
Richard McKeon, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Williams v. Harbert Barry, et al
as 11-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARBERT BARRY, Food Service Director, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, JOSEPH NEHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv12318
Plaintiff:
Harold Cage
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan, State of, Patricia Caruso and others
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grumbley #501014 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
Frederick Harvey Grumbley #501014
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Patricia Caruso, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fultz #129354 v. Mazanee et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Ray Fultz #129354
Defendant:
Unknown Mazanee, Unknown Sharp, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings #417330 v Caruso, et al
as 1:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
Walter Cummings #417330
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Shirlee Harry, Michael Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
