Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Trejo v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01284
Plaintiff:
Benny Trejo
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grice v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01175
Plaintiff:
William Grice
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naranjo v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01162
Plaintiff:
Alex Naranjo
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Wood et al
as 4:2013cv02301
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Unknown Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Wood et al
as 4:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
R Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Wood et al
as 4:2013cv01559
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Unknown Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley #072158 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01496
Plaintiff:
Rick Alton Foley
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, J Hernandez, M Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2013cv00684
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Preston Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #095075 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Nicholls, Unknown McGrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #095075 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Nicholls, Unknown Cluff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
