Cases 41 - 50 of 51
WOOD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv00029
Defendant:
C.I.F./CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY, CHAUNCEY COLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C. WOOD
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. COOKE et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Defendant:
NURSE CLARK, C. COOKE, OFFICER CULVAHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2013cv01883
Defendant:
JENNIFER BARNES, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, LOLITE JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS v. CUMMINS et al
as 1:2012cv00683
Defendant:
NURSE ANGIE, NURSE MICHELLE, NURSE NANCY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
MR:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
MRS:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. KRAMER et al
as 2:2011cv00219
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DENISE KRAMER and DR. MICHAEL LAMMERT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WELLS et al
as 2:2011cv00218
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, R. WELLS and DR. WILDES
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2011cv00819
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, DENISE KRAMER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. ALLEE
as 1:2011cv00660
Defendant:
BRUCE ALLEE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANUR v. POSNER et al
as 1:2010cv00462
Plaintiff:
KOOR ANUR
Defendant:
MICHAEL BENZA, JOEL M. FLAUM, LARRY J. MCKINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
DANA WOODS
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT, TOM APPLEGATE, KELLY CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
