Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jervis Brown, Hernaadis Harmon, Barry Cobb and others
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Lt. Richard Hetrick, Wade L. Hartly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitt v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Levar Dixion, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Weatherly et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Tolbert
Defendant:
Paul Weatherly, Sgt. Johnson, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Jasion et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Nurse Jasion, Donald Valenza, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Kelita Moore and James Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. King et al (INMATE 2) (MEMBER)
as 1:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Sharon King, Officer Moore and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Officer Morris
Consolidated Defendant:
Sharon King and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Logan et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Justin Stanley, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Morris et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Sgt. Morris, Donald Valenza, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
