Cases 51 - 59 of 59
MAISANO v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01705
Plaintiff:
DALE MAISANO
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DOCTOR GARCIA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DANBRADE v. CERCIELLO et al
as 5:2012cv05192
Plaintiff:
EFREN DANBRADE
Defendant:
MARK J. CERCIELLO, SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, LEHIGH COUNTY DOC, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANBRADE v. CERCIELLO et al
as 1:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
EFREN DANBRADE
Defendant:
MARK J. CERCIELLO, M.D., SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, LEHIGH COUNTY DOC, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOND v. SCI ALBION/DOC et al
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HAMMOND
Defendant:
SCI ALBION/DOC, DANIEL TELEGA, MARC GRUCZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv02744
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS and MARQUIS MOSLEY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC SUPERINTENDENT, JOHN HOMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DOC COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2009cv06096
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
KNIGHT, JOHN DOE. 1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. BEARD, et al
as 2:2008cv01148
Plaintiff:
RONALD CLARK
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, WILLIAM S. STICKMAN, SHARON D'ELLETO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMSON v. RUPERT DOC et al
as 2:2007cv05552
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
RUPERT DOC, D. KUHN and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
