Cases 51 - 60 of 8,489
Hasuan v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Dr. S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Major George Ferra, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Kalla et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Littlejohn
Defendant:
Dr. Ajai Kalla, Dr. Tabernik, Dr. Henie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison v. Weltcher et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roney Jauwan Addison
Defendant:
Sheff Jonny Weltcher, Chatham County Jail and Officer Lennerd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Ken Mathis
Defendant:
Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Florio et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Anthony Hill
Defendant:
John Florio, Carlos Escobedo, Lacy Florio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toles v. Newsome et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Quonterious Toles
Defendant:
Lt. Newsome and CO II Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, D W Harmon, Tina Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.