Cases 61 - 70 of 71
JORDAN v. S.C.I. HOUTZDALE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv03945
Plaintiff:
GERALD JORDAN
Defendant:
S.C.I. HOUTZDALE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, STATE COLLEGE EYE DOCTOR, CENTRE EYE PHYSICIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv07191
Plaintiff:
EVAN JORDAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. ENNIS et al
as 1:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant:
PAUL A. ENNIS and JOSEPH KOSAREK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05610
Plaintiff:
RONNIE S. JORDAN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and 'MHM' SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH
as 2:2011cv04664
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JORDAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00815
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JORDAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO, SERGEANT MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. SCI PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN
Defendant:
SCI PITTSBURGH and JEFFEREY A BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAPUTO et al
as 5:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
EMELIA CAPUTO , VICTORIA GESSNER , WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. CURRAN FROMHOLD COR. CTR. HOUSE OF CORRECTION
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
JORDAN COOK
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD COR. CTR. HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2010cv07241
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MALVIN S. LOCKETT, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
