Cases 61 - 70 of 117
BROWN v. LANCASTER et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDER v. SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARDER
Defendant:
GARY SEYMOUR, KEVIN SUTTER, MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEASON v. SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
SHIDEE DUPREE BEASON
Defendant:
GARY SEYMOUR and MICHAEL HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
GARY SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN F. WAGNER, JR., JOSEPH M. GEORGE, JR. and DAVID W. KAISER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON et al
as 2:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KRAMER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, THE NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPT., ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PISKANIN v. KOSTURA et al
as 5:2013cv02300
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES KOSTURA, GARY HAMMER, JOHN MORGANELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYFIELD v. STATE PRISON AT CHESTER et al
as 2:2013cv01943
Plaintiff:
GARY BYFIELD
Defendant:
STATE PRISON AT CHESTER and PA BOARD OF PROBATION, PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY et al v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, JAYENECA BAILEY, DENISE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, DANIEL GEHLMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
GARY CHARLES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHICHARD v. GLAZER
as 2:2012cv07202
Plaintiff:
MAURICE KING WHICHARD
Defendant:
GARY S. GLAZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
