Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Linton v. N.Y.C. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv04204
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Linton
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Correction, Kamora and Correctional Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. Joseph et al
as 1:2018cv02906
Plaintiff:
Julio Nieves
Defendant:
B. Joseph, M. Walker, Correction Officers John Doe ##1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotto v. Doe 1-5 et al
as 1:2018cv02130
Defendant:
Warden, Correctional Officer John Doe 1-5 and Correctional Officer Jane Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Jose Deleon Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. N.Y.C. Correctional Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2017cv09567
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Correctional Officer John Doe and Cennamo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Anna M. Kross Center et al
as 1:2017cv03115
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. Brooks
Defendant:
Anna M. Kross Center and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
Cyril N. Kendall
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Anthony J. Annucci, Ada Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Osborne et al
as 7:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
Jerome Anderson
Defendant:
Osborne, Carter, Sergeant P. (John Doe#1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdoulaye v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Sako Abdoulaye
Defendant:
Dr. Troy Brodwish, Officer Joseph Cimaglia, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falls v. Campbell et al
as 1:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Raiquan Ko Falls
Defendant:
E. Campbell, A. Pullen, Goodenough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, Sr v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv07134
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr
Defendant:
Captain Jane Doe and Correction Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
