Cases 71 - 80 of 269
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Barone et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Burgess
Defendant:
Barone, Lupis, Tawana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Correction et al
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Correction, John Doe, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenwood v State of Connecticut, et al
as 3:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Joshua Greenwood
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
John Yates
Defendant:
Richard Fisher, Maher Kasabji, Peter O'Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sakon v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Alan Sakon
Defendant:
John Johnson, F Perrone, Bruce D. Skehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Lupis et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Denny J. Burns
Defendant:
Francesco Lupis, Provider, Kristen Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Kaya et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Salazar
Defendant:
Kaya, John Doe, Debra Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
