Cases 71 - 80 of 651
Hankins v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Denzel Hankins
Defendant:
Murray, Williams, Star and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Scully et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Michael Benjamin Phillips
Defendant:
William E. Scully, Jr., Jody Wise and Baldwin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson, James William S. Jones, Arthur Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jack B Cole
Defendant:
Martha Williams, Wells R Turner, III, Nicholas Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang et al v. Washington County, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Lang, Timothy Keith Williams, John Michael Taylor and others
Defendant:
Washington County, Alabama, Brad Johnston, William Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rich
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Ashley M. Rich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Wade (INMATE 2)
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
William Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacoby v. West et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. West, Ms. Driggers and Ms. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Wade (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00816
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Bradford and William Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Tate (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Neil Andrew Robinson
Defendant:
William A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
