Cases 71 - 80 of 272
MOORE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, J. SNYDER, K. HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO C. GRIFFITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, HEATHER MILLS, BRENDA HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. ASHBA et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
SONNY DAVIS
Defendant:
ASHBA, STEVENS, JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING et al v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEVON STERLING
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BURTON PARSLEY, III
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, HOLCOMB and ROBERT R CARTER JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELLY v. BROCK et al
as 2:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
MARZONO REVELON SHELLY
Defendant:
BARBARA BROCK, RANDY VANVLEET and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. VANHILL et al
as 2:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DICKERSON
Defendant:
FRANK VANHILL, RUSSELL and HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIBB v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GEURIN D. BIBB
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, SGT DANGLER, SGT GEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. BURCHAM et al
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. GREGORY
Defendant:
BURCHAM, MURRY, HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
