Cases 81 - 90 of 1,579
Baker v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker and Ashley N. Baker
Defendant:
UA White, Captain Taylor, Amy Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Adkins et al
as 5:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Ortega
Defendant:
Jessica Adkins and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Boswell v. USA et al
as 7:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jared Boswell
Defendant:
USA, Lieutenant Kevin C. Pearce, Jr., Clinton L. Pauley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Couch v. Clay et al
as 6:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
KY County of Clay, Linda Smallwood and Patricia Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caldwell v. LeMaster et al
as 0:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jerry Caldwell
Defendant:
David LeMaster, Gary Chaney, Music and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Sammy Garcia
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazer v. Mullins, RN et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
P Mullins, RN, Amanda Miller, Crystal Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
