Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naji v. City of Augusta et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Issac Ali Naji
Defendant:
City of Augusta, Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Officer Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. MCDAVE et al
as 5:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
CECIL CURRY
Defendant:
STEVE MCDAVE and JEROME ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKISSICK v. DEAL et al
as 5:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. DEAL et al
as 5:2015cv00339
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRIS
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, CASEY CAGLE, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBBINS v. ROBERTSON et al
as 7:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE ROBBINS
Defendant:
WILLIAM ROBERTSON, MARTY ALLEN and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Tinger et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Davis Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Tinger, FNU Robertson and Stan Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Finger et al
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Davis Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Finger, FNU Robertson and Stan Sherperd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGGS v. Robertson et al
as 7:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
William Robertson, Avery Moody, CALVIN ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Medical Department et al
as 2:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael Cox
Defendant:
Medical Department, Edmonds, Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
