Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vaughn v. SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134 et al
as 2:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Vaughn
Defendant:
SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134, Ofc. Smith, Ofc. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ketron v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Ketron
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Christy Frazier and Jeff Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Flory et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Monolito B Cooper
Defendant:
Austin Flory, Chris Hall, John Argo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Childress et al
as 2:2021cv02458
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Defendant:
Mr. Childress, J. Vandiver, Mr. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayers v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Cerelyn 'C.J.' Davis, John Doe I, Sergeant Miller (John Doe II) and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Wellpath et al
as 2:2020cv02823
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Holliday, Wellpath, Ronald E. Abston and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Durell Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail
as 2:2019cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carl B Walker
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kicklighter et al v. Bedford County Jail
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Olin B Kicklighter, III, Keontis D Cunningham and Michael Rex Ray
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Jeremy B. Fuller
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction and Zac Rickettes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
