Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gaddis v. Lester, et al
as 1:2019cv01871
Defendant:
Johnnie Sharpe, Jr and J Lester
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. LaFayette Police Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Chambers County Detention Facility, LaFayette Police Department, Chambers County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jwaun Key'A Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Banks (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00427
Plaintiff:
Reginald Orlando Sharp
Defendant:
Calvin Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Zadock Mehuge Wilson
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Patrice Richie, Officer Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Richardson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Sergeant Richardson, Phyllis Billups, Billy Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Logan et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Captain Logan and Billy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puryear v. North Courtland Police Dept. et al
as 2:2011cv02600
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Puryear
Defendant:
North Courtland Police Dept., Ronald James, North Courtland Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Sharp Works v. Fleming et al
as 4:2008cv01045
Defendant:
Douglas D Fleming, Scott Walls, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Sharp Works
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Oliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01072
Plaintiff:
Yuself King
Defendant:
Terrell Oliver, C.O. I Bennett, C.O. I Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
