Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. McCoy et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deon Walker
Defendant:
Steven McCoy, A. David Robinson, Several Unknown Prison Officials of S.I.S.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhyne v. Hart
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Rhyne
Defendant:
Officer Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
