Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Alton Brown v. John Wetzel, et al
as 16-3611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, AKA Corizon and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JON FISHER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR II, LT VEROSKI, D. BRUMFIELD and others
Debtor:
SUSAN WHITE and ARCHIE TRADER
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Petko v. William Radle, et al
as 14-2047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PETKO
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIAM RADLE, GERALD GALINSKI, JOHN MURRAY and others
THOMAS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2013cv01153
Plaintiff:
GREGORY AARON THOMAS
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2013cv00465
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD , DAVID DIGUGLIELMO , DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Velasquez v. Diguglielmo, et al
as 12-4062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN VELASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
FELICIANO v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2012cv04713
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. FELICIANO
Defendant:
THOMAS DOHMAN, WILLIAM F. RADLE, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Montilla v. Prison Health Ser Inc, et al
as 11-3851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS MONTILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SER INC, PAMELA SUE FRANKLIN, RICHARD STEFANIC and others
Noah Carter v. Ralph Smith, et al
as 11-2863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOAH CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH SMITH, RICHARD STEFANIC, JULIE KNAUER and others
LORENZANO v. LINK et al
as 2:2011cv03551
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LORENZANO
Defendant:
LINK, EASON, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
