Prison Condition Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant: LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MENSAH-YAWSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2016cv00575
Plaintiff: STEVEN MENSAH-YAWSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATION, AGENT MICHAEL RADEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERGAL v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff: GOKHAN BERGAL
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAZARIY v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff: KMET NAZARIY
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALDRON v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff: WENDELL WALDRON
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALEH v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00313
Plaintiff: MAHMOUD SALEH
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOUD v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00318
Plaintiff: HASSAN HAMMOUD
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00316
Plaintiff: WILLY R. PEREZ
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTILLO v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00315
Plaintiff: OTTO P. PORTILLO
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVADENEIRA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00788
Plaintiff: FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?