Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Storey v. Cunningham (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Melvin Storey
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Christian Whittle
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Sonja Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Knight et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Sgt. Knight, Derrick Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Locklier et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Calvin Mays, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Gregory George Locklier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Mrs. Prichard
Plaintiff:
Shareef Kalil Merritt and Shareef Khalil Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00926
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility, Montgomery County Commissioner, Derrick Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher DeWayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Wanda J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Giles v. Derrick Cunningham, et al
as 18-10833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK CUNNINGHAM, MAJOR ROBINSON, LT. ALEXANDER and others
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tremane Carthen v. D. Marshall, et al
as 16-12822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREMANE D. CARTHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. T. MARSHALL, Sheriff, BATES, HUGHLEY, LPN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
