Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Sanchez v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv01591
Defendant:
Does 51-75, Does 1-20 and Does 21-50
Petitioner:
Juan Sanchez
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv05584
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Defention Facility, Sgt. Hoischer, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans, John or Jane Doe 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Defendant:
Ian Albert, Lt. Rold, City and County of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Two and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe, Newman and Dr. Medvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Ortega et al
as 5:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Isaias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jose Ortega, J. Thich, D. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
