Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Eric Jones v. E. Sparkman, et al
as 15-60266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DE'JUAN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. SPARKMAN, UNKNOWN EMCF DISCIPLINARY RECORDS CUSTODIAN, UNKNOWN EMCF ERS OFFICER and others
Albert Edmond v. Sandra Atwood, et al
as 14-60530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT EDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA ATWOOD, DALE CASKEY, E. L. SPARKMAN and others
Daniel Corring v. SMCI Supervising Officials, et al
as 13-60846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GEORGE CORRING
Defendant - Appellee:
SMCI SUPERVISING OFFICIALS, Watch Commanders, Psychiatric Doctors, WARDEN, SUPERINTENDENT and others
Jonathan Mosby v. T. Evans, et al
as 13-60819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN MOSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
T. EVANS, E. L. SPARKMAN, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and others
Albert Edmond v. E. Sparkman, et al
as 13-60609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT EDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. SPARKMAN, RONALD KING and CONNIE SMITH
James v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine A. James
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Raymond Detention Center et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Raymond Sheriff Detention Center, F. Shaw, R. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
F. Shaw, R. Rice, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Ruffin et al
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
B. Ruffin, F. Warden, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Hollie et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
H. Hollie, T. Naylor, M. Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
