Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Thomas v. Groom et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, James Burkes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis Robinson and Little Six
Defendant:
Captain Mary Groom, Unit Manager Brown, Correctional Officer Harrington and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellender v. Hall et al
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Barry James Ellender
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, James Bradley, Gabriel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunaway v. Daniels et al
as 5:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shawn Dunaway
Defendant:
Unknown Daniels, Unknown Walker, Unknown Bradly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faust v. Managment and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Faust
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corp., Wilkinson County Correctional Fac., Frank B. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groom v. Banks et al
as 1:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph Groom
Defendant:
Jackie Banks, Emmitt Sparkman, Unknown Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Frank Shaw, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Shaw et al
as 5:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Marcus Sears
Defendant:
F. Shaw, Christopher Epps, Archie Longley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrothers v. Perkins et al
as 5:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
Erikize Perkins, Mary Groom, Victoria Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Spiers et al
as 1:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richardson
Defendant:
Lance Spiers, Christa Groom and Pearl River County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
