Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ruffin v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Norman Ruffin
Defendant:
(First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Calhoun, (First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Clements, (First Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bibbs v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Bibbs, III
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth Attorney, David A. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Norman Ruffin
Defendant:
(First Name Unknown) Calhoun, (First Name Unknown) Clements, (First Name Unknown) Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
H.W. Clarke, Gary Bass, L.F. Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2014cv01315
Plaintiff:
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Warden Wright, Ms. Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykins v. Hightower et al
as 2:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dontrell Boykins
Defendant:
Hightower, Moffet and Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chittum v. Dixon et al
as 3:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
Mark Chittum
Defendant:
Dixon and Hightower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Abbasi et al
as 3:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCoy
Defendant:
Abbasi, Hightower and B. B. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
John K. Smith
Defendant:
V. Thomas, C. L. Hightower, Mirales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
