Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al -
as 4:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Joseph Dunnebacke, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Jeremy Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Kent Holtberg and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Figueroa v. Borne et al
as 5:2023ct03129
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rodriguez-Figueroa
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Borne, C/O Moneymaker, C/O Deane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. County of Franklin et al
as 5:2020cv00475
Defendant:
John Doe Detention Officers, Southern Health Partners, Inc., RLI Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. County of Franklin et al
as 5:2020ct03286
Defendant:
John Doe Detention Officers, Southern Health Partners, Inc., RLI Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03243
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03144
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Fields, Captain Enzor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
William I. Erwin
Defendant:
Eric Rodriguez, Chuck Vines, R. Van Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
