Cases 1 - 10 of 15
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
LLOYD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SUPT. PATRICIA THOMPSON, CAPT. ANDREW SKINNER and CHAPLAIN ABNER GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN
as 3:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LLOYD MITCHELL
Defendant:
DON BOYLSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DELOATCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
SEAN DELOATCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLOOM v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD BLOOM
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
BRAHIN LLOYD
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. SALAMEH et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant:
JAWAD A. SALAMEH, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant:
DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 1:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Goodson, III
Defendant:
Catherine C. Mcvay , Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 2:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. GOODSON, III
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVAY, MICHAEL L. GREEN, JEFFREY R. IMBODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
