Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01556
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL ISTICK and others
Plaintiff:
JULES MARQUIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Ramey v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv01018
Defendant:
Dr. Kollman, Lt. Deloite, Captain Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Litz et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Tina Litz and PrimeCare Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marquis Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04257
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARROW v. BUSH et al
as 2:2017cv01169
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS FARROW
Defendant:
ERIC P. BUSH, EVANICHKO, MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLOCK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS CARLOCK
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA and HOYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01461
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv02744
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS and MARQUIS MOSLEY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC SUPERINTENDENT, JOHN HOMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORRELL v. YOST et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
WILSON GORRELL
Defendant:
JOHN YOST, MICHAEL STEWART, JACK MARQUIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. WERTZ et al
as 1:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS GREEN
Defendant:
D. WERTZ, J.D. ROBERTSON and RAYMOND SOBINA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
