Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Moorer v. Jefferson County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Dorsey, Griggs, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Dewayne Moorer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Morton et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doyle Crowe
Defendant:
Celia Morton, Southern Health Partners, Dr. Cideus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Neely et al
as 2:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Morton
Defendant:
Tori Neely, Shanika Perry and Jack W. Meigs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Blount County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2009cv01358
Plaintiff:
Gary K. White
Defendant:
Blount County Sheriff's Department and Danny Morton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Guntersville City Jail et al
as 4:2009cv01290
Plaintiff:
Denny Ray Morton
Defendant:
Guntersville City Jail, Peterson, Grady Baugh and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01606
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Shaw
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wes Neil, R Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morton v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
Misty Morton
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Frank Albright and Espandolia Nicholson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Loya v. Morton et al
as 2:2007cv01244
Plaintiff:
John Robert Loya, Jr.
Defendant:
Danny Morton, R M Kent and Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Morton et al
as 2:2007cv01245
Plaintiff:
Julio Casir Morales
Defendant:
Danny Morton and Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Morton et al
as 2:2007cv01150
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown, John Robert Loya, Jr. and Julio Casir Morales
Defendant:
Danny Morton, R M Kent and Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
