Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16111
Plaintiff:
Marshawn Wright
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Frances Milsap, Haskeemah Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Muhammad McCray, et al
as 1:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamont Richardson
Defendant:
Jeelan M Muhammad McCray,, Maria L Torres, Sarah O. Iguodala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeelan Muhammad, Susan Shebel, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv06611
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Banks
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cook County IL et al
as 1:2021cv06245
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Defendant:
Cook County IL, Cook County Jail Staff, Cermak Health Service Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cermak Health and Services et al
as 1:2021cv01025
Defendant:
Nurse Muhammad and Cermak Health and Services
Plaintiff:
Qua'Twan Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Wexford Medical Source et al
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
C/O Korte, Sgt. Migneren, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad-Ali v. Fett et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Officer Fett, Officer Yannez and Thomas Dart
Plaintiff:
Solomon Muhammad-Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv06201
Defendant:
Thomas J Dart, Cermack Health Services, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
