Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel, et al
as 11-17587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden, DARREN BRADBURY, Captain, M. SMELOSKY, Associate Warden and others
Evans v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv04432
Plaintiff:
Phillip T Evans
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Greg Lewis, T. A. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cesar Rodriguez v. Cate, et al
as 11-15520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESAR R. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CATE, Director, ROBERT HOREL, Warden, MICHAEL SAYRE and others
Richard Terflinger v. Michael Sayre, et al
as 11-15058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD TERFLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. SAYRE, M.D., THOMAS MARTINELLI, M.D., SUE ELLEN RISENHOOVER, R.N. and others
Harris v. Horel et al
as 3:2010cv05231
Plaintiff:
Devonte Bernard Harris
Defendant:
Robert Horel, James Tilton, Joe McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
England v. Horel et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert England
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Francisco Taquez, Michael Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Chrones et al
as 4:2009cv05855
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Donell Perkins
Defendant:
L. Chrones, Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv05796
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker and Danny Troxell
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cate, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terflinger v. Sayre et al
as 3:2009cv03014
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Terflinger
Defendant:
Michael C. Sayre, Thomas Martinelli, Sue Ellen Risenhoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Cate et al
as 3:2009cv01769
Plaintiff:
Cesar R. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Cate, Robert Horel, Michael Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
