Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Brian Thompkins, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minton v. Officer Ritter et al
as 3:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Jerry Durrant Minton
Defendant:
Officer Ritter, Cprl Rodgers, Officer Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plott v. Clay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Prison Health Service, Jimmy Thomas, Brandon Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Curry Plott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Melchaske et al
as 2:2020cv01814
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Gaines, Tunswall and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Smith
as 1:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Lt. Smith
Plaintiff:
Bradley Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, D. Whitley, D. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Taywan Dewayne Campbell
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Captain Dansby, Officer Lampkin, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
