Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bushnell et al v. Madison County Jail IL et al
as 3:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
Joseph K Bushnell, Jevon Wilburn, Jason Spink and others
Defendant:
Madison County Jail IL, Sgt. Caldwell and Stephen Ridings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Boone County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 3:2022cv50298
Plaintiff:
Cristian J. Romero
Defendant:
Boone County Adult Detention Facility and Kurt Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galindez v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2021cv01044
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Romero Galindez
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, K. Schneider and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galindez v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2020cv00655
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Romero Galindez
Defendant:
K. Schneider, Faisal Ahmed and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galindez v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2020cv03859
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Romero Galindez
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, F.B.O.P and K Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eddmonds v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv03063
Plaintiff:
Romero Tramaine Eddmonds
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Tom Dart and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 3:2018cv02044
Defendant:
Lt Davis, David Gomez, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 1:2018cv06671
Defendant:
David Gomez, Michael Lemke, Counselor Eilts and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Hinton et al
as 1:2013cv04561
Plaintiff:
David Soto
Defendant:
Mr. Hinton, Bettie Barns, Manisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conwell v. Cook County et al
as 1:2012cv10062
Plaintiff:
Donald Conwell
Defendant:
Cook County, Lt. Bowers, Sgt. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
