Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Zahid et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Keon White
Defendant:
Zahid, Williams and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 7:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Brittany Alexander Smith
Respondent:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Brittnany Alexander Smith and Brittany Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Rogers, Lt. Jones, Col. Vergakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain et al v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
William Fain and Melissa Ann Wyatt
Defendant:
Daniel Smith, Jackie Byrd, Daniel Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
William Fain and Melissa Ann Wyatt
Defendant:
Daniel Smith, Jackie Byrd, Daniel Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
