Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Conley v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Captain Collier, Clifford Brown, Officer Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Conley Marquavious and Marquavious Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis Inc., Dr. Sharon Lewis, Dr. Mary Alston and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Mclain Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinson v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mark Hinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ruthie Shelton, Augusta State Medical Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDY SNEED
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, EDWARD PHILBIN and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. WILKES et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Alston and DITSLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. WILKES et al
as 5:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
SCOTT WILKES, ALSTON and DITSLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Stan Shepard, Ruthie Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2016cv00190
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, The State and Catonga Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
