Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Thompson v. Spoone et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Sergeant Spoone, 1st Sergeant Franzen and Major Gregory Mcrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Pochar et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Pochar and Sergeant Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Wethington et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, Ms. Ansar, Dr. Eric Van Buskirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Adcock et al
as 2:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeffrey Ryan Adcock, Corporal Vaughn, LT Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Criss et al
as 2:2016cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ray Wilkins
Defendant:
Sergeant Criss, Corrections Officer Hanson, Corrections Officer Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosby v. Arl. Cnty. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Attila Euripides Cosby
Defendant:
Arl. Cnty. Sheriff Dept., Deputy Glover, Sergeant Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Beale et al
as 2:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Strickland
Defendant:
James Beale, Major Sawyer, In-house Hearing Officer (IHO) Haden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lange v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Brian Lange
Defendant:
Lieutenant Miller, T. R. Hall, Officer Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
