Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CARTER v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI SANDERS
Defendant:
D. COULEHAN, E. HURD, CO. D. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIGUEROA v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
RENE FIGUEROA
Defendant:
DEREK F. OBERLANDER, SECURITY CAPTAIN CARTER, C/O MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDONA v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04376
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY CARDONA
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O ANTWI, O. FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPLESSIS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04377
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DUPLESSIS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, O. FORD, C/O ANTWI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETTS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALBERT EVERETTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, SGT JOHN DOE "WALTMIRE", JOHN DOE OSHLICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWSOME v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARTER, JOHN WETZEL, Lt. JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
BRAKEER NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
RODGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH, LT. JANE DOE and SGT. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEARY v. SGT. JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GEARY
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COUTTS, DAVID ONSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2013cv02874
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
