Cases 1 - 10 of 48
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, CHRISTOPHER CONWAY, RYSHAWN CRAWFORD and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Khashir Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY, Deputy Commissioner TERRANCE CLARK, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al.
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
LARRY SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK BILETNIKOFF, SUSAN STROMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ENOXH V HICE ET AL
as 2:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOXH
Defendant:
M. HICE, COULEHAN, LT. TROUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. OFFICER WILSON
as 2:2022cv01644
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
OFFICER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. CARNEY
as 2:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. WARDEN BISHOP
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
TURAHN SIMMONS
Defendant:
WARDEN BISHOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. GIANETTA et al
as 2:2021cv04962
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Respondent:
NANCY GIANETTA, C/O PETERS, C/O COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
