Cases 1 - 10 of 521
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, C.I.C. PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
MARK PRICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
LUKE JOHN SCOTT, SR.
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, WOLF and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. INDIANA STATE PRISON
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
PERCY JONES, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLINKENBEARD v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH DALE CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PHARMACY OF F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE and JAMIE AUTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
