Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
R. ROBINSON, T. JONES and M. CASTELLANOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. HICKS et al
as 3:2019cv16509
Defendant:
MR. M. SLAUGHTER, SARGENT EURE, OFFICER ING. and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE SMITH, AJAI SMITH, MR. CHAPPELL T. FLADGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HALL v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T. HALL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv00569
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYCE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07960
Plaintiff:
TORREY T. BOYCE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08000
Plaintiff:
GERALD T. FISHER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VENABLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2016cv07941
Plaintiff:
BERNARD T. VENABLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVID v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv07628
Plaintiff:
KWAME T. DAVID
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07535
Plaintiff:
MARQUES T. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
