Cases 1 - 10 of 45
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Allrich Jean
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, WARDEN NANCY GIANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
SHEELER v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv04944
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SHEELER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2015cv05188
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID C. SHUTER, MEANS, MCCLENDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Parker v. Philadelphia Prison System, et al
as 15-3144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, M. FARRELL, Warden of Curren-Fromhold Cor. Fac., LOUIS GIORLA, Commissioner of Phila. Prison Sys and others
WALKER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv07384
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WALKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CITY OF PHILA. PA JUDICIAL SYSTEM/COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILA. RECORDS DEPT. and PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM RECORDS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv03764
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BOYD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSIL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
FARRELL, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES/CORIZON, NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILA HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
LIONEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORPE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07231
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELLIOTT THORPE
Defendant:
MIKE NUTTER, THE CITY OF PHILA, CFCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
