Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles #237011 v. Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Kushawn S. Miles #237011
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langford v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv10939
Plaintiff:
Kristiel Langford
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, City of Detroit, Michigan, State of Michigan and others
Bryant #463608 et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Reo Bryant #463608, Donald Hicks #514050, Leonard Gregory Walker #651851 and others
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, The People of the State of Michigan, The People of the United States of America and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Tyrone Boswell #503804
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Davis #368425 v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, State of Michigan, Mike Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Davis #368425
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2014cv12765
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Jones
Defendant:
State of Michigan and Cindi Curtin
Hunter #229916 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00956
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
MDOC, United States of America, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
MDOC, Michigan Reformatory, Michigan Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
