Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cummings v. Kramer et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
R. Kramer, J. Carter, J. Smolke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MONTES-VASQUEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. MONTES-VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and MEDICAL STAFF OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JEFFREY SMITH, CHRISTIAN LEINBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
DAVID ONSTEAD, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DOUGLAS ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KING et al v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS et al
as 5:2019cv00389
Defendant:
WARDEN QUIGLEY, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS and others
Plaintiff:
DEDEON GREEN, CHARLES BETHEH, JERRY LEE WOMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORREA v. BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv04481
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CORREA
Defendant:
S. BROWN , BLOOM, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2017cv03254
Plaintiff:
JOSE VASQUEZ MORALES
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, MARIROSA LAMAS and TOMLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ-DIAZ v. OVERIEM et al
as 1:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANGEL VASQUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
JOHN OVERIEM, DAVID CULVER and JOHN GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv04760
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER VASQUEZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE, VICENT BROADNAX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
EDWIN VASQUEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
