Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Captain Johnson, Sergeant Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Shaun J. Hoover
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Eric Bryant, Tracy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2020cv02513
Defendant:
Sgt. Harris, Ofc. Watlans, Ofc. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Bonner et al
as 2:2020cv02152
Defendant:
Kirk Fields, Floyd Bonner, Lt. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilborn v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2019cv02301
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Wilborn
Defendant:
Lt. Holliman, Ofc. Bass, Coordinator Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Sandridge et al
as 2:2019cv02039
Plaintiff:
Devon Parker
Defendant:
Deputy Scott, Captain Bower, F/N/U Sandridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
