Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith #340475 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Paris J. Smith #340475
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teets v. Vanderwagen et al
as 4:2024cv10426
Plaintiff:
Jacob Robert Teets and Jacob Robert-Dearborn Teets
Defendant:
Vanderwagen, John Doe, Douglas and others
Foust #788816 v. Streit et al
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Brandon Foust #788816
Defendant:
Unknown Streit, Unknown Farber and Unknown Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron #223410 v. Washington et al
as 1:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Bergeron #223410
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Kenneth McKee, Richard D. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percival #220239 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Leon Percival #220239
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, J. Verboncouer, Mario Vialpando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Southfield, City of et al
as 2:2013cv15283
Plaintiff:
Timothy Caldwell
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, Southfield Police Department, Blake Matatall and others
Watson #148946 v. Wakefield et al
as 1:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Derryl Watson #148946
Defendant:
Unknown Wakefield, Mario Vailpando, J. Verboncour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #443696 v. Miller et al
as 1:2010cv00996
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones #443696
Defendant:
T. Miller, Unknown Sage, Carmen Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Caruso et al
as 2:2008cv13302
Plaintiff:
Willie Heard
Defendant:
Pat Caruso, Duncan Howard, Pindya and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
