Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cook v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cook
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Wentworth, Leigh Gilliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Corbray v. Sullivans, et al
as 23-35236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY LOUIS CORBRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SULLIVANS, Property Officer, Washington State Penitentiary, HEINBENGER, Property Officer, Clallam Bay Corrections Center, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 22-35625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections, ROB JACKSON, Associate Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor of the State of Washington and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Robert Jackson, et al
as 22-35514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT M. JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, CARIA SCHETTLER, Associate Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary and CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections
Ramon Silva v. Dileep Sreedharan, et al
as 22-35295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON SAUL SILVA
Defendant / Appellee:
DILEEP SREEDHARAN, Dr., Psychiatrist, Washington State Penitentiary, CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General and others
Williams v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2019cv01265
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary and Arce
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agee v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2008cv01009
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Agee
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County Prosecutor, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
