Cases 1 - 10 of 3,427
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00645
Defendant:
Dr. B. Mullen and Med Staff
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFFMAN v. C. LARGE et al
as 7:2024cv00636
Defendant:
Dr. Shah and NURSE PRACTITIONER C. LARGE
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 2:2024cv00536
Defendant:
Med Staff and B Mullen
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Catalino et al
as 2:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. Seth Catalino and Ms. O. Ipeaiyeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aljazairi v. Prince William Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv01537
Defendant:
Prince William Manassas Regional Jail Board, Sergeant Alex C Waleisky, Sergeant Justin Feder and others
Plaintiff:
Mustafa N Aljazairi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Cooper v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00576
Defendant:
Staff and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. V.C.U Health (M.C.V.)
as 2:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Bowen, Sr.
Defendant:
V.C.U Health (M.C.V.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Defendant:
Officer Cody Ridings, Unknown Defendants 1-5, Officer Austin Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rutherford v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv00527
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Gregory
as 2:2024cv00522
Defendant:
Alisa Gregory
Plaintiff:
Travone Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
