Cases 1 - 10 of 7,800
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Deontae L Hudson
Defendant:
Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Murray et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Antonio Swain
Defendant:
Billy Murray, Brown, Phillip Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
